
What a Delphi Consensus Says About Bone-Anchored Prosthetic Limbs
Researchers at the University of Colorado Anschutz gathered expert recommendations for a type of prosthetic care that has mostly run on experience rather than evidence.

Researchers at the University of Colorado Anschutz gathered expert recommendations for a type of prosthetic care that has mostly run on experience rather than evidence.

Cardiff University studies traced exaggerated advice and causal claims from press releases into news. A checklist for reading science headlines, grounded in named research.

Swapping near-identical words can change a scientific claim. Three named audits show how often causal language and hype words drift in abstracts, reviews, and journals.

Texas and California run nearly opposite standards systems. State agency documents and a 2004 institute review describe both processes and the textbook market they create.

A New York University team simulated weightlessness in a tabletop device. The genome barely noticed — which is the finding, and the caveat.

A retraction is not a erasure. It is a public record of where the checking failed — and reading it closely teaches more about how science works than most clean results do.

The design decides what your study can say. Match the method to the question, not the other way round.